Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	48.8% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 141 56% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 194 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 0504) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 5.7 Parallax 1.6 2% 3.17 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: N191129a SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 368 37 21 1.7 13 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 439 Write 381 Mixed 365 SusWrite 141 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 29.2 104% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 132 120% 178 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 6GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	47.1% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 15.2 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	168x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	50x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	50x

RAM
ACR512X64D3S13C9G 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 888 samples	20x
ACR512X64D3S13C9G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 1,571 samples	19x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 42%, 3,068 samples	13x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16