HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 213B
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170324
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '21 at 17:18
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 36.7
1-Core 23
2-Core 46.7
23% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 92.8
8-Core 93
12% 92.9 Pts
64-Core 89.5
6% 89.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
HP(103C 213B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.7
1% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD120GM7B 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 62 21 24 26 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 439
Write 346
Mixed 310
SusWrite 72.7
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.4
31% 7.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 86%
WD Elements SE 25FE 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 0.7
1% 0.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback