Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Memory 51.1 1-Core 26.5 2-Core 54.3 29% 44 Pts	4-Core 89.9 8-Core 99.3 12% 94.6 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B 4600) 1GB CLim: 650 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 355.60 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 12.5 11% 14.7 fps	MRender 19.1 Gravity 14.6 Splatting 13 12% 15.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 25 65 47 52 114 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.6% Below average	Read 239 Write 215 Mixed 196 SusWrite 69.9 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 11.4 57% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 75.5 DQ Mixed 1.7 25% 59.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	43x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	28x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	13x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	12x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $209

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16