Today's hottest deals

Compal VBL30 V2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemCompal VBL30 V2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardCompal Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130407
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 22:20
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 47
33% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 190
21% 166 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Compal(14C0 0070) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 3
3% 3.03 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 90 71 82 83 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 82.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 83.2
55% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BKH400SO51208-1333 N3S02F1333B-L67N 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.1
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VBL30 V2.0 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Compal VBL30 V2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback