To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180807
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 03:16
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 134
60% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 492
48% 394 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 38
24% 33.2 fps
MRender 41.2
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 32.1
30% 37.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ls600 240G 240GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0617A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 264 270 267 269 267 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 406
Mixed 369
SusWrite 287
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 39.7
133% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 123
153% 271 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 28.2
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback