Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX506LI_FX506LI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200911
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '20 at 20:28
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 249 75% 140 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 660 66% 534 Pts	64-Core 640 40% 640 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 84%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile) 33,798 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Asus(1043 1E91) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.5% Average	Lighting 53.9 Reflection 61.6 Parallax 52 44% 55.8 fps	MRender 61 Gravity 49.9 Splatting 48.1 43% 53 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 47%
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1E91) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9030 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.48% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 3.2 2% 3.23 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.48% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 256GB 1,127 User benchmarks, average bench 147% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 270 219 218 219 217 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 1,243 Write 896 Mixed 847 SusWrite 236 179% 806 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 63 224% 82.6 MB/s	DQ Read 675 DQ Write 860 DQ Mixed 579 489% 705 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 184%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 578GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 105 105 101 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 135 Write 94.5 Mixed 64.8 SusWrite 103 73% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 3200, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.5% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 18.6 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 19.8 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	32x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	9x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	31x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	10x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	15x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	10x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	9x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	10x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	10x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	7x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16