HP Compaq 6735s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6735s  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30E4
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 14:23
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD AthlonX2 DualCore QL-60
Unknown, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Memory 26.6
1-Core 26.4
2-Core 31.8
18% 28.3 Pts
4-Core 48
8-Core 49.6
6% 48.8 Pts
64-Core 46.7
3% 46.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
HP(103C 30E4) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M128C 128GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1231A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 157 147 121 151 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 176
Write 139
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 142
31% 137 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 10.8
37% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18.7
DQ Write 61.4
DQ Mixed 19.2
21% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 5.1
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 275
14% 275 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6735s Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP Compaq 6735s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback