Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus Z10PA-D8 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PA-D8 Series
Memory	35.3 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, , , 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '20 at 12:42
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 456 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 96.3 2-Core 190 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 753 67% 568 Pts	64-Core 2,300 142% 2,300 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Lighting 23.1 Reflection 27.2 Parallax 32.1 19% 27.5 fps	MRender 33.5 Gravity 30.4 Splatting 24.9 24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 21%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,137 Write 2,020 Mixed 1,428 414% 1,862 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 71 240% 83.2 MB/s	DQ Read 660 DQ Write 500 DQ Mixed 589 438% 583 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$79 26,606 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 399GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,379 Write 23.8 Mixed 38.6 821% 1,147 MB/s	4K Read 550 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 4.1 23,420% 185 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 384GB free Firmware: CC26 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 132 Write 90.8 Mixed 79.1 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB M393A5143DB0-CPB 40GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 2133, 2133, 2400, 2400, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	113% Outstanding	MC Read 53.3 MC Write 40.7 MC Mixed 42 130% 45.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 18.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 117%

UFO

System: Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v31stBench 67%, 867 samples	13x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v31stBench 68%, 414 samples	8x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v41stBench 71%, 283 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	11x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	9x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	8x

SSD
MZVLQ256HBJD-00BH1 256GBSamsungBench 115%, 2,359 samples	8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
HMA84GR7MFR4N-UH 8x31.9GBHynixBench 117%, 105 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GBSamsungBench 112%, 591 samples	5x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16