Today's hottest deals

Biostar A68N-5600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar A68N-5600  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 22:06
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4655M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 74.8
43% 64.1 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 125
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 260 80 82 79 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.3% Below average
Read 210
Write 129
Mixed 157
SusWrite 138
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 16.1
64% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 56.2
DQ Mixed 28.5
26% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
96GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 72 69 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 75.7
Write 51.5
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 69.5
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99P5471-004.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68N-5600 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A68N-5600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback