Lenovo 82C7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 82C7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 08:24
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 511
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3805) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28.05
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 15.6
10% 13.5 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 11.8
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V7 SSD 1TB
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 376 388 395 400 399 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 475
Write 387
Mixed 345
SusWrite 386
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 20.7
100% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 31.8
65% 129 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C16-16GRS Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82C7 Builds (Compare 662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback