Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '20 at 09:48
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$190 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 196 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 462 47% 382 Pts	64-Core 477 30% 477 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Lighting 22.6 Reflection 18.8 Parallax 21.4 18% 20.9 fps	MRender 26.1 Gravity 23.9 Splatting 17.1 18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 79 67 49 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 340 Write 119 Mixed 107 SusWrite 68.1 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 18.1 57% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 24.9 DQ Mixed 18.9 15% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 55%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB 4,247 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 24GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.6 8.5 8.2 8.6 8.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 13.3 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 8.9 22% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2.4 131% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HD5N-CG 4x4GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $190Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	22x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	16x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	16x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	17x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	3x
JM1333KLU-2G 2x2GBTranscendBench 39%, 308 samples	2x
VS2GB1333D4 4x2GBCorsairBench 47%, 334 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $190

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16