Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Standard L41II8 anf L41II9 (all builds)
Motherboard	Standard L41II8 anf L41II9
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071016
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '20 at 15:13
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron M 410 75 User benchmarks, average bench 23% U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Memory 58.1 1-Core 13.3 2-Core 13.9 24% 28.4 Pts	4-Core 7.7 8-Core 14 1% 10.9 Pts	64-Core 12.4 1% 12.4 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Disco Virtual da Microsoft 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 9.9 11 9.6 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.3% Below average	Read 109 Write 17.6 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 10.6 31% 41.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 65%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 147GB free Firmware: D005DEM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 14 14 14 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 68.5 Write 68 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 14 35% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 39%
Kingston DT Micro 16GB 522 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 168a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.8 3.3 3.5 3.8 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.07% Terrible	Read 15.6 Write 9.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.2 10% 8.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 25% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.89% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.37 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.89% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16