Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 09:03
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 983
88% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,535
95% 1,535 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 146
Parallax 134
108% 138 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 139
Splatting 120
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 321 325 326 327 327 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 470
Mixed 452
SusWrite 338
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 49.4
164% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 126%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB
293GB free
Firmware: 0111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 390 388 385 384 385 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 363
Write 373
Mixed 355
SusWrite 388
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 28.7
93% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 167
122% 158 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N2170 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 107 108 107 112 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 69.5
Write 115
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 97.5
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.5
209% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GTZ CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GTZ 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 30.5
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 10.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 96.5
42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $796
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback