Today's hottest deals

HP Z200 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z200 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B40h
Memory4 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100506
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 16:29
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3460
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 60
2-Core 126
55% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 135
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 20
16% 19.3 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 16.4
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10002
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 115
Mixed 65.6
69% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
35.9% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback