PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B360M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190322 |
Uptime | 3.5 Days |
Run Date | Nov 24 '20 at 11:53 |
Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
Run User | ISR-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
81.4%
Excellent
|
81% 137 Pts
|
70% 545 Pts
|
60% 901 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1660-$230
PNY(196E 1325) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.1%
Above average
|
69% 80.3 fps
|
39% 43.9 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
67.6%
Good
|
72% 25.1 GB/s
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
54% 74.2 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $141Bench 87%, 175,323 samples | 1,595x |
Core i5-8400Intel $172Bench 85%, 225,330 samples | 1,166x |
Core i7-8700Intel $270Bench 89%, 240,111 samples | 1,088x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $210Bench 53%, 406,996 samples | 547x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $230Bench 69%, 131,487 samples | 481x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,047,709 samples | 460x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $530 |