Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual T3400-$70 2,721 User benchmarks, average bench 33% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Memory 35.7 1-Core 10.3 2-Core 15.4 16% 20.5 Pts	4-Core 17.1 8-Core 19.4 2% 18.2 Pts	64-Core 16.6 1% 16.6 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Sony(104D 9045) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.31% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.35 Parallax 0.38 0% 0.37 fps	MRender 0.29 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 0.52 0% 0.32 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.31% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 200 192 203 205 197 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.4% Below average	Read 159 Write 203 Mixed 140 SusWrite 196 40% 175 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 11.2 46% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 56.7 DQ Write 42.8 DQ Mixed 28.8 27% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.28% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2.4 6% 2.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 1 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.43 GB/s	Latency 223 18% 223 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.28% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM