Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 14:44
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 69.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 299
91% 173 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,162
104% 877 Pts
64-Core 2,703
167% 2,703 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 185
Parallax 168
143% 176 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 129
Splatting 121
97% 118 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 215 279 289 284 280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,412
Write 1,264
Mixed 1,198
SusWrite 294
285% 1292 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 68.3
226% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 1,003
DQ Mixed 985
742% 989 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 229%
Great: 280%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
417GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1791 829 586 593 585 591 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,317
Write 1,886
Mixed 1,320
SusWrite 829
302% 1,338 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 57.5
174% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,339
DQ Write 1,000
DQ Mixed 1,199
888% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 210%
Great: 262%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
460GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 96 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 156
Write 139
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 99.1
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 198 191 211 213 206 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
297GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 121 128 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 162
Write 140
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 125
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
355GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 138 130 136 141 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 53.9
Write 93.7
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 137
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FD 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 31.7
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 32.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR Builds (Compare 830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback