Today's hottest deals

HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory89.9 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 19:02
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 166
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 578
54% 447 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Gigabyte(1458 4028) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.9% Average
Lighting 54.1
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 49.3
44% 52.4 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 48.8
44% 54.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA250CM10003 250GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STRSD012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 169 184 190 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.5% Good
Read 247
Write 240
Mixed 239
SusWrite 176
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 34.6
113% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 193
146% 194 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 126%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
405GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 154 164 175 184 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.8% Above average
Read 203
Write 99
Mixed 197
SusWrite 170
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 27.3
92% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 152
126% 180 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 102%
Team T253LE120G 120GB
42GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 159 135 69 63 62 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.1% Above average
Read 244
Write 123
Mixed 171
SusWrite 108
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 25.1
95% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 156
128% 181 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 85%
Apple HDD ST2000DM001 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: AP54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 165 168 187 188 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 144
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 176
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 105%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ17RG4BBWD-GN-F ID:02 FE EBJ17RG4BBWD-GN-F ID:02 FE EBJ17RG4BBWD-GN-F ID:02 FE EBJ17RG4BBWD-GN-F ID:02 FE EBJ17RG4BBWD-GN-F ID:02 FE EBJ17RG4BBWD-GN-F 130GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback