Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 16:39
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 237
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 612
65% 519 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10CF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.87
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 52.9
46% 56.2 fps
MRender 44.7
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 50.6
40% 48.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.30.02
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 25.2
16% 33.7 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 22
Splatting 22.3
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 787 858 852 793 225 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1354
Write 875
Mixed 844
SusWrite 598
204% 918 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 68.5
237% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 218
250% 416 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 187%
Great: 209%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 130 126 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 117
Write 127
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 127
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 23.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback