| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8Z77-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121005 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 17 '20 at 11:01 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.4%
Good
|
65% 107 Pts
|
31% 230 Pts
|
14% 229 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
18% 19.8 fps
|
17% 21.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 433 451 435 357 357 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
99% 438 MB/s
|
137% 46 MB/s
|
278% 371 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 320GB-$59
298GB free
Firmware: GM3OA5BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 82 82 82 82 MB/s
|
45.9%
Average
|
51% 69.8 MB/s
|
176% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5402-030.A01LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
57.1%
Above average
|
56% 19.6 GB/s
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
65% 61.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,276 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 334x |
| Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 219x |
| Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 179x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 83x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 58x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $442 |