Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II P340-$50 2,473 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	30% Below average	Memory 50 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 60.7 30% 47 Pts	4-Core 62.8 8-Core 51.1 8% 56.9 Pts	64-Core 66.1 4% 66.1 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 11,054 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21B8) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 1.19 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.76 fps	MRender 0.86 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 189 206 187 208 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.4% Average	Read 211 Write 202 Mixed 180 SusWrite 190 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 17.5 68% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 94.1 86% 131 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 110%
Ext Hard Disk 500GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 327GB free, PID 021b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 26 24 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 23.1 Write 21.8 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 24.2 30% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSX4GX3M1A1600C9 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 800, 0 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.9% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 8.6 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16