Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW199
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 07:39
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5472
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 43
2-Core 86.2
44% 67 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 331
30% 252 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2667) 3GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 34.3
20% 28.2 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 26.7
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X312
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 169 168 127 156 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 385
Write 401
Mixed 268
SusWrite 148
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 29.7
108% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 62.1
81% 147 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 108%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
257GB free
Firmware: GM4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 82 82 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49% Average
Read 88.7
Write 86.3
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 81.8
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 10
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 5
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback