Today's hottest deals

Toshiba dynabook R632/H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba dynabook R632/H  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA dynabook R632/H
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130625
Uptime9.5 Days
Run DateNov 06 '20 at 15:15
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3437U
Socket BGA1023, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 0.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.5% Poor
Memory 40
1-Core 13.6
2-Core 23.2
19% 25.6 Pts
4-Core 29.1
8-Core 39.7
4% 34.4 Pts
64-Core 36
2% 36 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 0004) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.57
Reflection 4.73
Parallax 2.72
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 5.91
4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF256GMCS 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FSTAN103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 198 237 251 259 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 318
Write 123
Mixed 266
SusWrite 235
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 13
41% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 69.2
DQ Mixed 79.6
63% 88 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0.8
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical dynabook R632/H Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba dynabook R632/H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback