Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1,642 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 165 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 654 58% 494 Pts	64-Core 1,658 103% 1,658 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 27 23 26 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 312 Write 29 Mixed 138 SusWrite 26.4 27% 126 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 8.8 38% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 55%
Dell PERC H310 9TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2TB free Firmware: 2.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 21 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 44.5 Write 24.7 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 25.3 24% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70BH1-CH9 8x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 37 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 30.2 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.5 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	96x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	78x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	76x

GPU
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	35x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	27x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	21x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	33x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	28x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynix-00ADBench 87%, 150 samples	26x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94