Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Memory 28.2 1-Core 19.5 2-Core 33.4 18% 27 Pts	4-Core 33.2 8-Core 34 4% 33.6 Pts	64-Core 35.2 2% 35.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3629) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.19 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.17 1% 1.01 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 34 99 118 44 58 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 139 Write 148 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 76.3 22% 96.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Mixed 15.6 15% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 8.6 32% 9.85 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
SABRENT 160GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 22GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 24 24 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 24 Write 24.5 Mixed 18 SusWrite 22.9 16% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 4.8 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 3.3 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 266 15% 266 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ20UF8BCS0-DJ-F 6GBSamsungBench 35%, 70 samples	1x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16