Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	31.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.5GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	28.5 GB free of 31.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '20 at 02:07
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 17 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 15 cores, 30 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 45.8 1-Core 30.3 2-Core 112 35% 62.7 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 460 33% 302 Pts	64-Core 969 60% 969 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 268GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 408 393 413 385 387 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 489 Write 168 Mixed 326 SusWrite 385 76% 342 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 4.5 15% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 81%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 11 69 170 100 46 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29% Poor	Read 458 Write 389 Mixed 434 SusWrite 89.2 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 5 17% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 31GB 257 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 15872 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 15 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 4.1 13% 4.47 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 203%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16