Lenovo 34602D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 34602D3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 34602D3
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121226
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 19:59
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3667U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 41.3
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 45.2
37% 56 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 174
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F9) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.17
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD5SG2256G1052E 256GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.02.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 317 333 329 315 277 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 400
Write 342
Mixed 144
SusWrite 310
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 20.5
70% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 118
109% 170 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5174BM0-YH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback