Supermicro X8SIE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSupermicro X8SIE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8SIE
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '17 at 07:09
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon L3426
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 128
63% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 274
29% 231 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
PNY(196E 05CF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.37% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.41 fps
MRender 0.38
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.26
0% 0.36 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.37%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 262
Write 180
Mixed 159
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 9.29
55% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 39.9
58% 109 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5673FH0-CH9 M393B5673FH0-CH9 M393B5673FH0-CH9 Micron 18JSF25672PDZ1G4F1 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X8SIE Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X8SIE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback