Asus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop E406SAS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop E406SAS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E406SAS
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 13:54
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-E8000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 49.7
1-Core 19.8
2-Core 39.6
26% 36.4 Pts
4-Core 77.7
8-Core 76.5
10% 77.1 Pts
64-Core 76.5
5% 76.5 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 1F00) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.34
1% 1.36 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.83
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674EB0-YK0 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
24.8% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback