Acer Predator PO9-900

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 124% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Acer Predator PO9-900 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO9-900
Memory	54.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191211
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '20 at 15:41
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 75.6 1-Core 141 2-Core 281 89% 166 Pts	4-Core 554 8-Core 1,049 96% 802 Pts	64-Core 1,795 111% 1,795 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37A8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 167 Reflection 168 Parallax 176 136% 170 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 151 Splatting 112 119% 150 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 475 189 258 239 185 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 823 Write 561 Mixed 627 SusWrite 318 130% 582 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 159 4K Mixed 44.9 183% 77.2 MB/s	DQ Read 502 DQ Write 536 DQ Mixed 464 364% 500 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 144%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 14TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 6TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 59 60 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.8% Very good	Read 186 Write 174 Mixed 92.8 SusWrite 58.6 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 2.5 513% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 21GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 88 86 86 87 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 77 Write 60.8 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 85.8 51% 69.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 114%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 14TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 12.5TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 59 60 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.5% Very good	Read 198 Write 192 Mixed 134 SusWrite 58.6 108% 146 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 3.8 797% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 85%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 14TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 59 60 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.8% Above average	Read 137 Write 167 Mixed 130 SusWrite 58.6 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 3.4 650% 4 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 81%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 6TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 59 60 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.9% Good	Read 168 Write 194 Mixed 142 SusWrite 58.6 105% 141 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 3.3 711% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 82%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 77GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 173 156 150 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	75% Very good	Read 166 Write 178 Mixed 111 SusWrite 163 209% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 96%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 119GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 80 81 81 82 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 140 Write 131 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 81.7 117% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 42% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston ACR26D4U9D8MH-16 Kingston ACR26D4U9D8MH-16 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 56.4 MC Mixed 33.1 118% 41.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 9.6 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO9-900 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 111%

UFO

System: Acer Predator PO9-900

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	38x
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	25x
Core i9-9900XIntel $590Bench 84%, 3,521 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	29x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	22x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	17x

SSD
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 189%, 2,051 samples	14x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $125Bench 128%, 20,782 samples	8x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBIntel $192Bench 217%, 33,949 samples	8x

RAM
HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 84%, 1,261 samples	15x
ACR26D4U9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 687 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 8x16GBCorsairBench 115%, 173 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $878

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16