bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime25.7 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 22:11
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5640
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 123
44% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 123
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 3 2.1 2 1.7 2 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 444
Write 178
Mixed 332
SusWrite 4.7
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 23.4
79% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 148
131% 194 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 77%
Vmware Virtual disk 129GB
119GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 176 133 96 89 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 329
Write 250
Mixed 332
SusWrite 126
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 20.3
76% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 253
201% 280 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 6.7
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback