TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hitachi HA8000/RS220

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory72GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 72GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHitachi HA8000/RS220  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 7TTSHEa
Memory69.4 GB free of 72 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '20 at 07:14
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5640
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 110
53% 83 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 367
36% 296 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 62.5%
 Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC H310 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 7.3 8 8.8 8.1 8.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.3% Very poor
Read 42.4
Write 5.2
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 7.6
12% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 14.3%
 Great: 87%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
24GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 5.9 2.2 1.1 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.75% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 1
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 5
13% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
59% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 7.75%
 Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 72GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 8192, 2048, 8192, 8192, 2048, 8192, 8192, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 46.5%
 Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback