Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5620 3,527 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 63.4 2-Core 111 56% 87.6 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 250 26% 212 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 849GB free Firmware: 032 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 223 228 237 222 239 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	78.7% Very good	Read 250 Write 239 Mixed 233 SusWrite 228 54% 237 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 45.5 146% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 90.2 98% 165 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 125%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB 3,164 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 343GB free (System drive) Firmware: A9FA SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 55 58 57 60 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 59.3 Write 63 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 56.2 40% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 280GB free Firmware: HP64 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 93 94 94 95 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 94 Write 49.8 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 93.4 54% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 58GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.2% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 17 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 10.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16