Lenovo 4291DD4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 4291DD4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4291DD4
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 01:42
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 88.4
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 49.3
40% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 200
20% 162 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DA) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 1.81
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 2.13
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 26 47 25 137 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 389
Write 311
Mixed 294
SusWrite 83.2
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 11.9
45% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 45
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 43.2
30% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D3R4GS16B8R 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback