bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory42GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 42GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory38 GB free of 42 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190313
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateSep 28 '20 at 16:24
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5645
None, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 58.5
2-Core 118
52% 83.8 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 386
38% 312 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 69GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 127 127 127 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.7% Below average
Read 220
Write 210
Mixed 208
SusWrite 126
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 9.9
32% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 114
86% 115 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 72%
Apple SM0128G PCIe 121GB
113GB free
Firmware: BXW1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 632 630 630 631 631 630 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 733
Write 629
Mixed 506
SusWrite 631
140% 625 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 14
44% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 363
261% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96%
Great: 220%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 483GB
384GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 127 127 127 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.7% Below average
Read 219
Write 210
Mixed 208
SusWrite 126
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 9.8
32% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 115
87% 116 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 42GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
3968, 17536, 21504 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.2% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 19.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback