Hp-pavilion GC674AA-ABA m8120n

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion GC674AA-ABA m8120n (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek Basswood3G
Memory	3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070524
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '20 at 19:17
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	92%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad-$90 5,765 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 67.1 1-Core 27.7 2-Core 55.2 35% 50 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 109 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT 4,580 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 060A) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	0.93% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 0.16 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.66 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.93% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2512G 512GB 14,867 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 160 201 203 204 208 MB/s Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.1% Above average	Read 246 Write 233 Mixed 222 SusWrite 193 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 18.1 80% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 33.9 63% 126 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 320GB-$36 4,086 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 37GB free Firmware: V54OA7BA SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 45 45 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 54.9 Write 56.2 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 44.4 35% 47.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 40%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 492GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 21.4 Mixed 18 SusWrite 12.7 15% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.5 159% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 280GB free Firmware: MN6OAA10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 95 93 96 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 75.3 Write 83.9 Mixed 48.6 SusWrite 94.1 55% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 85%
PNY USB 3.1 FD 248GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 50GB free, PID 00fe Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 23.9 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 11.3 30% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.6 168% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 38%
Hitachi HDS723030ALA640 3TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 516GB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 25.9 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 12 31% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.4 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.5 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GC674AA-ABA m8120n Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion GC674AA-ABA m8120n

CPU
Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
GeForce 6600NvidiaBench 0%, 968 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion GC674AA-ABA m8120n

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Hp-pavilion GC674AA-ABA m8120n

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)