Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10BE0027UK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 10BE0027UK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 11:38
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$30
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 189
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 274
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 309F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 4.41
3% 4.59 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 105 89 112 111 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 101
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 69%
USB FLASH DRIVE 32GB
25GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
9.56% Terrible
Read 30.2
Write 14.4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 16.4
19% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.56%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030KD68F9F1600 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback