MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	MSI MS-7885
Motherboard	MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180615
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '20 at 04:33
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Memory 91.6 1-Core 139 2-Core 263 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 554 8-Core 928 90% 741 Pts	64-Core 1113 69% 1113 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3703) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.5% Very good	Lighting 78.1 Reflection 117 Parallax 103 64% 99.4 fps	MRender 101 Gravity 104 Splatting 102 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB 26,659 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 233 238 247 240 235 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 476 Write 426 Mixed 359 SusWrite 238 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 68.9 4K Mixed 34.7 116% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 224 178% 248 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 272GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 234 234 244 237 230 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 467 Mixed 429 SusWrite 236 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 50.1 164% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 283 213% 285 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 129GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 68 68 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 82.5 Write 81 Mixed 66 SusWrite 67.3 55% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 517GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 153 155 156 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 151 Mixed 103 SusWrite 154 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 116 114 106 116 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	65% Good	Read 112 Write 110 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 115 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 67%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 1,009 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 159 158 161 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 167 Mixed 91 SusWrite 160 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 307% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 685GB free Firmware: MS2OA810 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 176 177 177 178 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 176 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 176 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 107%
WD Elements 2620 5TB 4,390 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 80 81 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 59.8 Write 60.5 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 81.6 91% 65.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD 4x4GB 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 52.6 MC Mixed 38 124% 43.2 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 20.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	397x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	244x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	104x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	91x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	53x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	30x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	17x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	34x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GBKingstonBench 82%, 9,100 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16