Asus H97I-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97I-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 14:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690S-$141
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 408
55% 412 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6
Parallax 6.34
3% 5.38 fps
MRender 8.33
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 7.52
5% 6.05 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 127GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0530C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 135 117 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 454
Write 144
Mixed 195
SusWrite 136
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 37.2
133% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 133
118% 180 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 77%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB
43GB free, PID null, SanDisk Ultra Fit 256GB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 51 53 58 27 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 125
Write 68.8
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 44.8
95% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
132% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.8% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97I-PLUS Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97I-PLUS - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback