Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	7.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Emaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe (all builds)
Motherboard	EMAXX EMX-A70FM2+iCafe
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190409
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '20 at 14:35
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6300 APU 9 User benchmarks, average bench 38% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.18% Terrible	Memory 9.12 1-Core 37.3 2-Core 41.9 16% 29.4 Pts	4-Core 41.2 8-Core 45.4 6% 43.3 Pts	64-Core 42.4 3% 42.4 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.18% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	7.82% Terrible	Lighting 8.93 Reflection 9.12 Parallax 2.19 7% 6.75 fps	MRender 12.5 Gravity 9.73 Splatting 10.5 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.82% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 73 74 78 68 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 361 Write 261 Mixed 151 SusWrite 73.8 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 20 55% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 67.5 DQ Mixed 87.8 66% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 110GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 105 104 96 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 75.2 Write 78.9 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 99.5 55% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 88%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 255GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 70 71 64 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 68.5 Write 74 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 67.5 84% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 79% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-038.A00LF 99U5584-012.A00LF 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.63 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 412 10% 412 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	27x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	14x
Radeon HD 8370DAMDBench 2%, 5,124 samples	13x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	6x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	4x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28