Sapphire IPC-AM3DD785G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardSapphire IPC-AM3DD785G  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 17:45
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 910e
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 66.2
38% 56.7 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 136
16% 127 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 8752) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.8% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 67.9
59% 70 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 62.5
62% 78.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 149 147 127 109 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.2% Poor
Read 207
Write 182
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 128
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 0.9
38% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 22.6
24% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
648GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 68 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 64
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 68.9
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback