Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '20 at 12:35
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 85
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 373
51% 377 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 71
Parallax 96.6
58% 79.7 fps
MRender 73.7
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 60.5
55% 68.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LM480HMHQ-00005 480GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXT5204Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 351 353 344 317 338 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 353
Write 344
Mixed 250
SusWrite 342
73% 322 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 32
110% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.5
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 42.8
39% 58 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $183
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback