Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120913
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '20 at 21:24
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 90.5 2-Core 151 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 230 31% 229 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(105B 0DCC) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.69 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.56 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 110 119 102 119 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 154 Write 207 Mixed 189 SusWrite 117 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 29.5 97% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 33.8 DQ Write 83.1 DQ Mixed 40.1 36% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 85%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1TB 4,641 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 432GB free Firmware: 0302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 26.3 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 19.1 19% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 18GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 16 16 16 16 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	9.44% Terrible	Read 32.3 Write 25.2 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 14.9 23% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 28% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.44% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ST25664BA1339.8FMD Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 859B ST25664BA1339.8FMD Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.4% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.6 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	9x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	7x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	4x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	4x

SSD
120GB 120GBRescue08rm22ar120hyBench 60%, 9 samples	5x
Extreme Pro 240GBSanDisk $79Bench 92%, 10,862 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	3x

RAM
FLFF65F-C8KL9 4x4GBKingmaxBench 49%, 72 samples	5x
M378B5273DH0 4x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 61 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 26 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $342

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16