Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5350M APU 1,074 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Memory 31.1 1-Core 48.2 2-Core 47.9 27% 42.4 Pts	4-Core 60.5 8-Core 66.1 8% 63.3 Pts	64-Core 65.3 4% 65.3 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8450G 901 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 510A) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2.12 Parallax 1.59 2% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2.87 2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74 9,892 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 160 160 161 161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 314 Write 173 Mixed 200 SusWrite 155 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 25.8 83% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 114 89% 123 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung 8GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 5.5 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 248 16% 248 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
A6-5350M APUAMDBench 38%, 1,074 samples	15x
A10-5750M APUAMDBench 41%, 4,247 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 8450GAMDBench 2%, 901 samples	15x
Radeon HD 8650GAMDBench 5%, 4,043 samples	4x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
Force 3 180GBCorsair $384Bench 46%, 1,204 samples	2x
SHFS37A240G 240GBKingstonBench 63%, 518 samples	1x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x
1x4GBHynixBench 19%, 8,928 samples	3x
Samsung 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 35 samples	3x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16