Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu LIFEBOOK P1620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK P1620  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB1E1
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080306
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 28 '20 at 18:56
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo U7600
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Memory 40.5
1-Core 6.9
2-Core 18.7
17% 22 Pts
4-Core 12
8-Core 12.3
2% 12.1 Pts
64-Core 17.9
1% 17.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MCBOE32G8APR 33GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.2.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 325
Write 4.5
Mixed 1
79% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.36% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.7 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1.2
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.36%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback