ADD TO PC
BUILD

TYAN B8252T75AV26HR-2T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	TYAN B8252T75AV26HR-2T (all builds)
Motherboard	TYAN S8252GM2NE-2T
Memory	250.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200709
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '20 at 06:26
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core 43 User benchmarks, average bench 66% P0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 64.9 1-Core 120 2-Core 238 76% 141 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 881 81% 680 Pts	64-Core 4,625 286% 4,625 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 410GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 540 534 535 534 534 537 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	208% Outstanding	Read 1,749 Write 532 Mixed 441 SusWrite 536 178% 814 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 179 4K Mixed 54.9 232% 92.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1076 DQ Write 528 DQ Mixed 590 494% 731 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 254%
Broadcom MR9560-16i 7.5TB 7TB free Firmware: 5.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4239 4197 4195 4190 4112 3853 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 0GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 37.1 Write 6.3 Mixed 10 17% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 71% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 38%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 28GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 18 18 18 3.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 36.9 Write 19.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 16.7 29% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.5 142% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A8G40MB2-CVF 4x31.8GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 16 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 26 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 23.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback