Today's hottest deals

Dell Studio 1735

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 57% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemDell Studio 1735  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0H275K
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081204
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 18 '20 at 16:49
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T8100-$78
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Memory 39.1
1-Core 11
2-Core 22.9
18% 24.3 Pts
4-Core 20.7
8-Core 21.6
3% 21.2 Pts
64-Core 21.3
1% 21.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Dell(1028 0256) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 1.53
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 0.78
1% 1.86 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 3.39
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V400 120G 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0527A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 79 97 100 103 103 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.5% Poor
Read 114
Write 102
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 94.2
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 7.2
32% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 59.6
DQ Write 52.7
DQ Mixed 46.2
37% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 60%
Generic SU08G SD Card 8GB
7GB free
Firmware: 8.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.8 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 4
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 4
4% 6.05 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.8
385% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.49% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio 1735 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio 1735

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback