ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 3209C21

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 3209C21 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '20 at 01:33
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 74.6 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 189 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 356 47% 353 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Asus(1043 046A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Lighting 69.7 Reflection 57.9 Parallax 89.8 57% 72.5 fps	MRender 61.5 Gravity 64.8 Splatting 77.5 57% 67.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 55%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 107 29 56 58 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 476 Write 413 Mixed 12.4 SusWrite 111 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 0.3 43% 11 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD32G133381 8502 PSD32G133381 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.6% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 91.1 44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback