Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '20 at 15:21
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 80.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 816
79% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,219
75% 1,219 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.8% Average
Lighting 62.2
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 85.5
51% 71.2 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 54.2
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
759GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1876 979 1009 1018 1016 1011 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,806
Write 2,067
Mixed 1,359
SusWrite 1,152
359% 1,596 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 53.3
190% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 211
221% 386 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 222%
Great: 347%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
931GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 481 480 480 480 480 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 481
Mixed 441
SusWrite 480
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 58
192% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
748GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 449 448 449 448 448 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 450
Mixed 412
SusWrite 450
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 24.7
126% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 36.7
106% 224 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 100%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1734 1720 1688 1709 1716 1741 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 1,763
Write 1784
Mixed 1,346
SusWrite 1,718
372% 1,653 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 78.9
258% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,035
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 415
447% 750 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 297%
Great: 311%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 170
Write 18.9
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 19.8
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 35.7
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 31.8
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $710
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback