Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 1410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 5%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.04%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 1410  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JM11-MS
Memory0.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 01:31
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel U2300
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Memory 13.1
1-Core 10.7
2-Core 15.2
8% 13 Pts
4-Core 16.9
8-Core 24.6
3% 20.8 Pts
64-Core 27
2% 27 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 029B) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.12% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.26 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 0.35
0% 0.29 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.12%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK8032GS 80GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 13 9.4 9.6 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.17% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 4.3
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 10.7
6% 7.38 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 12%
Kingston DataTraveler 108 8GB
2GB free, PID 1660
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4.1 4.1 3.6 4.1 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 4
Mixed 1
SusWrite 3.7
6% 5.73 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GT64U8HD0BN-AD 7F94 SG564283FG8NWIL-Z1 3GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.22% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.53 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1.4
4% 1.5 GB/s
Latency 376
11% 376 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 1410 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 1410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback